Vaccine Racket Contaminates Nobel Prizes: School Mandates Evidence Criminally-Negligent Manslaughter

Vaccine Racket Contaminates Nobel Prizes: School Mandates Evidence Criminally-Negligent Manslaughter

New Evidence from Government Records Exposes Fraud in Vaccine Safety Assurances: What You Need to Know to Stop Mandates Based on Two Nobel Prizes in Medicine, and Three Virus “Discoveries”


Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz


New laws mandating viral vaccines for school children prompted this review of government records pursuant to the 2008 Nobel Prizes in Medicine awarded to two researchers for their “discoveries” of two “novel” “sexually-transmitted” viruses reported to “cause” AIDS and cervical cancers. Both diseases emerged clinically during the mid-to-late 1970s at the same time herpes was exploding. These viruses, HIV/AIDS and HPV, the cervical cancer microbe, along with the sexually-transmitted hepatitis B virus (“HBV”) prompted dramatic changes in society and healthcare leading to current efforts to mandate vaccinations for school children for HPV, polio, hepatitis viruses, and more. New evidence, however, of scientific fraud and fraudulent concealment of risks evidenced by government records challenge these Nobel “discoveries,” public health measures, vaccination mandates, and claims of vaccine safety in general. New compelling, neglected, and concealed evidence from government-recorded lab virus experiments identifies a bio-medical virus-production “racket” influencing the media and sex industry that raises serious questions regarding the “General Acceptance” of vaccines as trustworthy. This paper critically examines this medical malpractice and serves constructive notice to officials pursuant to facts in evidence required for their dutiful administration of health policies to avoid liabilities and damage to citizens.



In October 2018, this author, who has written extensively about government involvements in the vaccine industry, was asked to testify before the Hawaii Department of Public Health regarding changes to vaccination laws affecting school children and enrollments that includes a new “List of Required Vaccinations.” Added therein for “required” “Kindergarten – 12th Grade Attendance” was the Hepatitis A and B vaccines and HPV vaccine. The later two are widely known to be “sexually transmitted diseases” not risking the lives of young children. A quick review of the package insert for Gardasil, (1) the HPV vaccine made by Merck, showed the mixing-up of two control groups, one receiving saline and the other amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (“AAHS”) adjuvant. The AAHS “can have a profound influence on the magnitude and quality of the immune response to HPV vaccine.” (2) Combining the two control groups confounded the true assessment of risk. These two substantial discrepancies prompted this author to conduct the following retrospective study of HPV and its vaccine now on the government’s mandatory list for “vaccine preventable diseases.”

According to U.S. Government records published during the 1970s, the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) and National Cancer Institute (“NCI”) assembled an international coalition to study cancer viruses for vaccine developments during the 1960s. The unprecedented collaboration was titled the Special Virus Cancer Program (“SVCP”). (3) This comprehensive international research group sought “candidate viruses” that “caused” cancers amendable to “preventative vaccines.” This effort predated President Nixon’s “War on Cancer” by a decade.

In 2008, the Nobel Prize in Medicine went to German virologist, Harald zur Hausen, for reportedly “discovering” the “cause of cervical cancer” in 1976–the “oncogenic human papilloma virus.” (4)  That “discovery” was made during the time the SVCP was administered by the NCI. So a review of its science pursuant to the emergence of HPV was reasonable. In 1983, zur Hausen reportedly “isolated” the new “tumourigenic HPV16 and 18 strains.” The following year, In 1984, zur Hausen is reported to have “cloned HPV16 and 18 from patients with cervical cancer. These HPV types were found in about 70% of cervical cancer biopsies throughout the world,” according to the press release issued by the Karolinska Institute–home to the esteemed Nobel Prize Committee. (4)

Public relations press officers for the KI and Nobel judges claimed zur Hausen’s “discovery” and “theory” of cancer causation by a single “tumorgenic agent” flew in the face of “dogma.” (4) Previously, the SVCP-NCI coalition held that “co-factors” for “co-carcinogenesis” involved multiple “risk factors.” At the time, there was “General Acceptance” in science that this co-factor model was accurate. During the 1960s and 70s, there was General Acceptance that cancers were caused by myriad factors such as stress, risky lifestyles, biological and/or chemical agents, or their cumulative damage to human immunity resulting in cancers. This “immuno-suppression” model was the working premise of the SVCP and NCI’s efforts. Chemicals, environmental factors including radiation, and biological agents such as viruses were known to cause genetic damage prompting cancers. Cells mutated forming tumors and malignancies from the overwhelming assaults to DNA/RNA and cell repair.

That was the “dogma” in medicine and science before zur Hausen postulated that there were certain types of herpes viruses that “caused” malignancies. (5) These DNA viruses, KI officials reported, “could exist in a non-productive state in the tumours.” Zur Hausen’s “specific searches for viral DNA” sourced his “discovery” that “led to characterization of the natural history of HPV infection, an understanding of mechanisms of HPV-induced carcinogenesis and the development of prophylactic vaccines against HPV acquisition.” (4)

Simultaneously, Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier were likewise credited for having “discovered” the single “cause of AIDS–the human immunodeficiency virus (“HIV”). Virus production, the KI press reported, “was identified in lymphocytes from patients with enlarged lymph nodes in early stages of acquired immunodeficiency, and in blood from patients with late stage disease.” (4) The KI’s press release added, “They characterized this retrovirus as the first known human lentivirus [i.e., slow acting virus] based on its morphological, biochemical and immunological properties. HIV impaired the immune system because of massive virus replication and cell damage to lymphocytes. The discovery was one prerequisite for the current understanding of the biology of the disease and its antiretroviral treatment.” (4)

KI’s promotions neglected , however, this institute’s important role in advancing these “discoveries” more than a decade earlier as a collaborator in the SVCP. It also neglected the reasons the Nobel awards committee rejected Dr. Robert Gallo‘s nomination. It had come to public knowledge that Montagnier, collaborating with Gallo in the SVCP, was defrauded by Gallo who had renamed the “French virus” “a couple of times,” wrote one of Gallo’s colleagues. (5) Apparently, Gallo acted to fraudulently conceal his use of Montagnier’s virus to justify Gallo’s claim of having discovered the AIDS virus before Montagnier.

Solid evidence has emerged since then from the Supreme Court’s ruling on the “Daubert standard” concerning the trustworthiness of so-called “experts,”  and society’s “General Acceptance” of science that is often untrustworthy. “General Acceptance” has evolved as a legal “term of art” that holds special meaning in this review. According to the “Daubert standard” established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), previously-concealed facts are admissible as evidence against the General Acceptance standard.

SVCP records (3) evidence officials at the esteemed Nobel Prize committee’s Karolinska Institute (“KI”) in Sweden did fraudulently conceal their own agency’s conflicting interests in zur Hausen’s award. At the same time, the KI promoted and commercialized their cancer enterprise’s investments in “single cause etiology virology,” neglecting their own past efforts in early gene cloning, virus mutation experiments, pioneering lab technologies, vaccine research and developments, and subscription to the multi-factorial model of cancer.

In addition, the telling government records from the 1970s shown below detail the KI’s involvements with the National Cancer Institute (“NCI”) in recombining strains of DNA herpesvirus with strains of RNA tumor viruses isolated from patients worldwide with malignancies. The SVCP collaborators “transformed” benign or “latent” herpes viruses into model cancer triggers. These studies were well-justified in science’s search for the causes and cures for cancer. (3)

But it is unreasonable and irresponsible that the General Acceptance in medicine, science, and society, heavily influenced by KI’s esteemed Nobel Prize Committee, would be deprived of honest information affecting public health, consumer safety, and informed choice-making under these potentially catastrophic circumstances risking world health. Such silence imposed upon intelligence for concealed commercial interests begs redress. Science is presumed to be honest. The medical-legal community holds dishonesty as actionable and such fraudulent concealment or silence as obstructive to justice. The sequestering of the SVCP Progress Reports (3) is akin to  “evidence tampering” in law. Denying due process in medical discovery risking and impacting millions of lives is arguably treasonous and genocidal.

These wrongdoings and “impressions of impropriety” are compounded by superficial dismissals of SVCP’s questionable methods, materials, and outcomes.(6) The United States General Accounting Office (“USGAO”) did this in an alleged “whitewashing” of this subject in 2002.(6) Rather than thank honorable colleagues, citizens and politicians who bravely encourage transparency, discovery, and open debate over these matters of vaccine safety and the cancer industry, the suspects have discouraged such dialogue. Vaccine industrialists argue in favor of censorship, and produce diversionary propaganda, in light of the risk to public confidence in the vaccine industry and corporate profits. (7)(8) Vaccine advocates argue open dialogue will undermine compliance with increasingly “mandated” vaccinations, and place the general population at risk. General Acceptance of vaccination policies is largely based on these dangerous positions evading critical facts. (7-9)

Equally troubling, to sustain the silence and combat opponents, certain vaccine industrialists have commissioned public relations firms, social media “trolls,” and Internet “pseudo skeptics” to issue propaganda to protect the global enterprise. Like protection racketeers, these propagandists smear whistleblowers and authors who raise such debate. (10)(11)

The following facts evidence the seriousness of the science being concealed, following this author’s 2001 report in Medical Hypotheses.(12) This new evidence from old records begs for scientific scrutiny and public discourse. These findings of facts show powerful conflicting interests have imposed the General Acceptance upon which government officials choose to act in advancing mandatory vaccinations. (13) A multinational corporate conspiracy to defraud the public and fraudulently conceal the laboratory creation of cancer-linked viruses HPV, HBV, and HIV is vetted by the public records examined below. (14) The impact on policy makers and the public gaining this medical-legal intelligence is considerable.


1. Shown below are photocopies from the 1971 and 1972 SVCP, Progress Reports 8 and 9. These government records prove the program’s initiation in 1962, the year Sarah Stewart and Bernice Eddy discovered the “SE [Stewart Eddy] polyoma virus” that was contaminating the Merck drug company’s polio vaccines found associated with cancers.(3) These SVCP documents were published exclusively for internal review by collaborators in this program governed by the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Division of Cancer Cause and Prevention, National Cancer Institute. (14) These documents were rarely found in medical libraries prior to this author’s publication in 1996 of Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? wherein related documents are reprinted and analyzed. (15)

2. Page 410 of the SVCP-NCI Record #9 identifies the KI, below Johns Hopkins University (America’s leading hepatitis B research enterprise). Above the KI listing is “Life Sciences, Inc”–a private company that no longer exists after changing its name to Life Sciences Advanced Technologies, Inc. The “Life Sciences Industry” is the premier drug and vaccine (i.e., pharmaceutical and biotechnology) enterprise commonly called “Big Pharma.” The Life Sciences company began in 1962. As stated above, this date coincides with the year the SVCP-NCI program began, immediately following the discovery of SE polyoma virus, renamed by Merck Drug Company’s chief vaccine developer, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, the “SV40” virus.

There is General Acceptance today that SV40 contaminated the early polio vaccines and spread cancers worldwide.(3) From 1962 forward, Life Sciences evolved to become Big Pharma’s leading provider of molecular biology products and services as proven by the screenshot below. It is also known that the Life Sciences Building at Los Alamos Laboratory is where Dr. Gerald Myers et. al. published his “Big Bang” theory of HIV/AIDS’s emergence in the “early 1970s”, based on the use of “genomic sequencing” products and services provided by this company. (15)

3. Shown below is Dr. Gerald Myers’s “Big Bang Theory” of HIV/AIDS’s emergence in the “early 1970s.”(15) “The ‘Patient Zero’ theory smearing the gay community was determined to be false, largely due to Myers’s discoveries. The alleged “hoax” of Randy Shiltz’s “Patient Zero” diverted from the laboratory-origin vaccine-transmission theory corroborated by Myers’s publications. Picked up by the mainstream press, the Patient Zero falsehood also diverted from Dr. Robert Gallo’s NCI SVCP involvements that Gallo deceptively denied in 1996 at the XI International Conference on AIDS in Vancouver, WA. (The interchange between this author and Dr. Gallo is seen on the Internet HERE. It has been viewed by more than 6 million concerned citizens).

gerald-myers-big-bang-evidence4. The same year that zur Hausen first published his “discovery” of HPV, 1976, the first Gay Related Immunodeficiency Disease (“GRID”) patient was “discovered” in New York City. (4) Curiously, those events also coincide with the 2-to-5 year “incubation period” for HIV to express itself in AIDS-related leukemia, lymphoma, and sarcoma lesions following system-wide immunosuppression. Accordingly, the first GRID/AIDS cases would have acquired their infections between 1971 and 1975. This too is consistent with Myers’s determinations. (12)

5. Under “Major Findings” of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wister group, the SVCP-NCI published in 1972 what was accomplished in 1971: “Rescue attempts have been initiated employing human sarcomas and leukemias in a variety of combinations designed to activate latent viral genomes.” (14)

6. The next SCVP-NCI Report #9 photocopy shown below, contains Johns Hopkins University’s contract description. This, like the Hopkins “contact page” reprinted above, appears immediately above KI’s contact page, and likewise, their contract description. The Hopkins’ description states, “The contractor will compare antigens in cervical carcinoma cells with those induced in Hep[atitis-2 (B-type)] by Herpes simplex virus type I and II.” From this it is clear that the Hopkins group triggered hepatitis B infections using Herpes simplex viruses. Then they compared these viral antigens from Herpes type I and II with the antigens found in cervical cancers.

7. The hepatitis B vaccine theory on HIV/AIDS’s emergence, precisely as Myers’s lab showed exploding in North America and Africa in the “early 1970s,” derives from documented studies on gay men in NYC and central African sex workers, conducted between 1972-1974 by the Merck Drug Company–the maker of both the hepatitis B vaccine and the HPV vaccine (i.e., Gardisil) (12)

8. The National Institutes of Health Contract 71-2059 to Merck and Company, Inc. (shown below from Report #8) is titled “Study of Viruses in Human and Animal Neoplasia (i.e., cancer). Directed by Dr. Maurice R. Hilleman, and Robert Gallo’s bosses at the NCI, Robert Manaker and Jack Gruber, the Objectives included developing “vaccines or other agents effective for the prophylaxis and therapy of human neoplasia of suspected viral etiology.”  In that contract, it states: “At the present time, investigations will be focused upon herpes-type (DNA) viruses and “B” and “C” type (RNA) particles. Parallel studies to evolve live attenuated and killed viral vaccines in appropriate animal model systems will be conducted.” (14)

9. Furthermore, the SVCP contract NIH-71-2025 (from 1971 Report #8) shows Project Officer Dr. Robert Gallo officiating for the NCI. His collaborators explained their Objective of “Evaluation of long-term oncogenic effects of human and animal viral inocula in primates of various species. . . ” Progress was reported on “An RNA-dependent DNA polymerase [reverse-transcriptase enzyme that characterizes HIV/AIDS and other “lentiviruses”] similar to that associated with RNA tumor viruses.” Gallo’s associates detected these enzymes “in human leukemic cells but not in normal cells. . . . The [reverse transcriptase] enzyme was isolated, purified and concentrated 200-fold, making possible its further characterization and study in relation to the leukemic process in man.” (14)

Mind you, this was published in 1971, in Project Report #8. Accordingly, this research was done in 1970. And by 1972, vaccines to presumably prevent the AIDS-like viruses were tested in humans. This date corresponds perfectly with the 1972-74 hepatitis b vaccine trials conducted on the gay men in NYC as discussed below. (3) It also corresponds perfectly with Myers’s “Big Bang in the early 1970s” implicating vaccine vectors. (12)(15)

10. Complicating matters is the 1969 Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970, Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives, Ninety-First Congress, Part 5, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Dept of the Army. Tuesday, July 1, 1969, pg. 79, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office record that states under the caption “SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS”:

Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organism.s. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million. (7) [i.e., $2 million per year over 5 years.] (15)

11. The SVCP was administered by the Litton Bionetics company on behalf of the NCI and Life Sciences industry. (12)(15) This group was overseen by NCI Project Officer Robert Gallo during the early 1970s. During those years, Litton was contracted (under NIH 69-2060) to administer “Support Services for the Special Virus Cancer Program”) Under that contract, Litton supplied the experimental viruses, monkeys, chimpanzees and vaccine reagents to SVCP collaborators, including the Merck Drug Company under Merck’s contract (NIH 71-2059, titled “Oncogenic Research and Vaccine Development.” (Copies of these contracts are downloadable by clicking: Litton Bionetics and Merck Drug Co SVCP Contracts in 1971). (14)

12. Litton received in the neighborhood of $2 million per year over “5 years at a total cost of $10 million” beginning in 1969, the year U.S. Government appropriations for “SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS” descriptively and functionally identical to HIV/AIDS were authorized by Congress. The screenshot below excerpted from the Congressional Record, correlates with the express provisions described in Litton contracts. (See: Project Reports 8 and 9.)

Standards of Review

A. “General Acceptance” of “Vaccine Preventable Disease,” Safety & Efficacy Concerns

In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579 (1993) the Supreme Court ruled that  “‘General acceptance’ is not a necessary precondition to the admissibility of scientific evidence under the Federal Rules of Evidence, . . . .” (13) Furthermore, “Pertinent evidence based on scientifically valid principles will satisfy those demands.” This decision, directed by the Court that was challenged by the defendant’s falsification of evidence, encouraged judges, like members of the public and scientific community, to consider scientific intelligence “not generally-accepted.” The Supreme Court made this decision based on determining that “reliable” scientific publications were not “reliable” due to their tainting by commercial interests.

B. Silence and Sequestering Science Presents a Pattern of “Most Persuasive” Evidence

The Supreme Court also ruled in the case of United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 US 149, 154 – Supreme Court 1923 that “Conduct which forms a basis for inference is evidence. [And s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character.” This is applicable to the “silence” of health officials and vaccine administrators regarding the risks, and the media’s similar silence and censorship regarding risks of vaccine injuries, including autism and cancers commonly associated with herpes-type cancer virus contaminations in vaccinations, including herpes-B, simian cytomegalo virus, and the Epstein-Barr virus (“EBV”) linked to cancers, including leukemias and lymphomas commonly produced by Gallo et. al. at Litton Bionetics during the SVCP between 1969 and 1973 as the above contract proves.

C. Criminally negligent manslaughter and assault with a deadly immunization practice

Under New York law, PEN § 125.10 “A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with criminal negligence, he causes the death of another person. Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.” Unlike Hawaii, any “vehicle” in New York, including a syringe, satisfies the element.

With respect to mandating vaccinations knowing harm often results, under HI Rev Stat § 707-710 (2013)  (1) A person commits the offense of assault in the first degree if the person intentionally or knowingly causes serious bodily injury to another person. (2) Assault in the first degree is a class B felony. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1; ree L 1986, c 314, §51; gen ch 1993]

In Hawaii, “negligence” is defined by Hawaii HRS §702-206(4). The actor should be aware of a “substantial and unjustifiable risk” with respect to the actor’s conduct, the attendant circumstances, and the result of the actor’s conduct. The actor’s failure to perceive the risk must constitute a “gross deviation” from the standard of care that a law-abiding person would observe in the same situation. (See §702-206(4).) The offense is a class C felony.  Negligence is indicated here, given knowledge that official justifications for administering risky vaccines are flawed and proven false by the aforementioned facts as further discussed below.

D. Fraud and Fraudulent Concealment in Virology and Vaccinology

Under Hawaii case law, the elements of fraud include: “(1) false representations were made by defendants, (2) with knowledge of their falsity (or without knowledge of their truth or falsity), (3) in contemplation of plaintiff’s reliance upon these false representations, and (4) plaintiff did rely upon them.” Shoppe v. Gucci America, Inc., 14 P. 3d 1049 – Haw: Supreme Court 2000. And fraudulent concealment has been defined as “employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation, and misled or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action. The acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent.” Lemson v. General Motors Corp., 66 Mich. App. 94, 97, 238 N.W.2d 414, 415 (1975) quoting De Haan v. Winter, 258 Mich. 293, 296, 241 N.W. 923, 924 (1932). See also: Au v. Au, 626 P. 2d 173 – Haw: Supreme Court 1981.

E. Relevant federal standards

Title 18, U.S.C., § 241-Conspiracy Against Rights. “If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”

Title 18 USC § 1349Attempt and conspiracy. “Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense under this chapter shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.“

Title 18 USC § 4 – Misprision of felony. “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.“

Title 18 Part I Chapter 96  § 1961 – “racketeering activity” means “(A) any act or threat involving . . . bribery [and/or] extortion, . . . or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; (B) any act which is indictable under any of the [many] provisions of title 18, United States Code. . . ”


It has come to the public’s attention through respected science journals that the field of medicine has been substantially damaged by fraud committed by special interest groups benefiting “Big Pharma” or the “Life Sciences” industry. “(11)(

“Something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations, “wrote Richard Horton, the editor of the esteemed Lancet wrote in 2015. (16) “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. . . .”
Dr. Horton concluded his heroic editorial stating, “The bad news is that nobody is ready to take the first step to clean up the system.”
The aforementioned facts corroborate Dr. Horton’s indictment of science and the forces undermining its legitimacy.
This author shares the honorable Lancet editor’s sentiments, but disagrees with his conclusion. As this paper proves, there are many of us in science and medicine who have taken “the first step” only to be smeared and ostracized by the same enterprise mostly responsible for the fraud in science–the Life Sciences industry. (8, 11) I took that “first step” in 1996 with the publication of Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?  (15) Subsequently, I added a peer-reviewed scientific summary in Medical Hypothesis bravely financed and administered by the late unjustly smeared editor, David Horroban. (11) It is that “unclean system” that imposes illegitimacy in science along with “General Acceptance” of its falsehoods. (13) Abuse of the media, including “peer reviewed” publications by propagandists, incorporates the most well-studied science of all–behavioral science. This social engineering of General Acceptance imposes deadly consequences. In this instance, “mandatory vaccinations” foreshadows side-effects from the vaccines for HPV, hepatitis, polio, and other GMO-laced injections. This poisons bloodstreams, damaging brains, and induces cancers according to empirical evidence witnessed worldwide. In the United States, for instance, an explosion of need for special educators now burdens the economy attributable to skyrocketing rates of autism among mercury-poisoning victims. All while health officials excuse the association as “unproven” and “debunked” “conspiracy theory.” (17)

A. The Facts Controvert Earlier AIDS-Origin Theories: HIV, HPV and HBV are Lab Viruses Engineered for Vaccine Research and Developments According to the NCI and NIH’s Neglected SVCP Records

Confusion over Koprowsky’s and the Wistar Institute’s alleged role in the AIDS outbreak exemplifies the problem with earlier AIDS-origin theories. Koprowsky was falsely accused by Rolling Stone magazine for causing the AIDS outbreak. That indictment was later retracted.  But the scandal rocked medicine. It indicted the Salk vaccine’s transmission of SV40 cancer virus and polio.

Sabin’s OPV was also confirmed to have spread SV40-related cancers. These transmissions occurred during the 1950s during Koprowsky’s watch.(3)  That evidence, compounded here, corroborates Bernice Eddy’s warning that pandemic cancers would certainly come following SV40’s widespread transmission through Merck’s tainted polio vaccines produced by both Salk and Sabin.

Accordingly, author Edward Hooper was not far off the mark in The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS. He conjectured that the Wistar Institute’s research had contaminated Albert Sabin’s oral polio vaccine (“OPV”) carrying chimpanzee simian immunodeficiency virus (“SIVcpz”) that is the closest relative to HIV in the primate world. But Hooper’s critics, many “pseudo-skeptics” paid to protect the status quo by muddling media, promptly “debunked” Hooper’s claimed association after confirming that “monkey cells—not chimpanzee cells” were used by Koprowsky.(9) The “smoking gun”–the chimpanzee vector–in the origin of HIV/IDS mystery was still missing.  It is no longer. It is vetted below.

The facts seriously implicate the Litton/SVCP cohort for the 1976 clinical emergence of GRID/AIDS (“HIV”), the contemporaneous creation of the liver cancer virus hepatitis B (“HBV”), and the cervical cancer virus–human papilloma virus (“HPV”). These strains and types of viruses were commonly mutated and tested by the Litton/SVCP NCI-NIH contractors years before their announced discoveries by men who concealed their knowledge of these most substantive facts.

This widespread neglect of Litton’s actions, like this author’s publications, (3; 8) evidences a vaccine racket and reckless concealment of medical history.  The press today, biased by conflicting interests more than ever, has obscured the General acceptance among cancer virologists that vaccines have been vectors for communicable diseases. But this doesn’t sell vaccines, advertising space WIRED, or inspire public confidence.

Dr. zur Hausen too, like Koprowsky, worked at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia. Wistar, along with the Karolinska Institute, is equally suspect as SVCP collaborators, as is Montagnier’s 1970s work in collaboration with Dr. Robert Gallo. These historic associations are grounds for reconsidering these researchers’ 1980s “discoveries.”

Otherwise, It is unreasonable to neglect or excuse Montagnier’s and Gallo’s aversion to discussing their roles in the SVCP. To date there is only silence and censorship concerning the high probability that the “French specimen” sourced, like Gallo’s HTLVs, from Litton’s SVCP-NCI-NIH Contract 71-2025. That contract, shown above, proves these researchers isolated “RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in human leukemic tissues” in the late 1960s or early 1970s. This predates by 13 years Montagnier’s “discovery” of this kind of unique, never-before-seen, retrovirus enzyme. (You need the virus to extract its enzyme.) It is unreasonable to believe that no investigator in Litton’s lab, allied with Gallo’s group at the NCI, would not have isolated similar “lentiviruses”/retroviruses by 1972 as their contract proves they were commissioned to do.

Further evidencing Litton’s and Gallo’s important roles in the origin of HIV/AIDS from the first hepatitis B vaccine trials is the contracts shown above and below. NIH-71-2025, shown above, states, “Australia antigen was given to newborn African green moneys. “Australia antigen” (“AuAg”) reported in the SVCP publications was the first known agent causing hepatitis. “AuAg” was later re-named “hepatitis B virus” and “HBV.”  12)(14)(15) Shown here is Litton’s official statement that corroborates Dr. Maurice Hilleman’s recorded statement, “We [at Merck] brought in the African greens. We didn’t know we were importing AIDS virus at the time.” (7)

Litton Bionetics was certainly the supplier of these viruses to Merck and the other SVCP collaborators. Litton exported the test animals, especially monkeys and chimpanzees from their colonies overseas to Merck in New York under contract number NIH-69-2060 —“Support Services for the Special Virus Cancer Program,” as shown below.

This record also proves viral recombination studies using known cancer triggers, including “EBvirus with immunostimulation and immunosuppression” coupled with hepatitis B viral experiments; and in the same lab, the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase (i.e. “reverse-transcriptase AIDS-virus enzyme) was studied with retrovirus recombinations.

B. Litton Bionetics’ Supply Contracts and the Outbreak of HIV, HBV and HPV

Constructive notice is given here to health officials, the scientific community, and corporate-controlled media, regarding the central role of Litton Bionetics’s NCI-SVCP supply contracts, especially NIH-69-2160, in the outbreaks of HIV, HPV, and HBV (i.e., hepatitis B virus) and the ongoing risks of inducing cancers through vaccinations presumed “safe.”

This author was the first to evidence Litton’s chimpanzees were used to grow the viruses needed for the first hepatitis B vaccines manufactured by Merck and tested on homosexuals considered at high risk of hepatitis in NYC between 1972 and 1974. (12)(15) Additional groups targeted for this trial were native Americans, kidney dialysis patients, black women (presumably sex workers) in Central West Africa, and Willowbrook State School for the mentally ill on Staten Island in New York. (12)(15) Co-investigators represented the U.S. Army, the New York University Medical Center, and the New York Blood Bank.  (12)(15) Financing this commercial enterprise were the real-parties-in-interest in the pharmaceutical and defense industries. Suspects above the rank of “principle investor” included blood-banking officials and leading stockholders in the companies profiting from vaccine manufacturing and blood-banking. Purcell’s 1976 grant application shown above makes these facts known.

Most relevant to AIDS and its origin from Litton and SVCP labs, these studies predate by more than a decade the “detection” and “isolation” of the precise cancer complex pathognomonic for AIDS.  (A pathognomonic sign is a particular sign whose presence means that a particular disease is present beyond any doubt.) This sign is also pathognomonic of AIDS’s origin from Litton’s lab and/or collaborating SVCP labs involved in the suspect hepatitis B vaccine trials. This cause-effect reasonable conclusion is based on the Litton group’s contract statement that they isolated and used  “viral antigens” from “human tumors” “particularly leukemias and sarcomas” the combination of which is pathognomonic for AIDS. And they did so by 1972, 10-years before Montagnier (and falsely Gallo too) “discovered” the AIDS virus.

Litton Bionetics’s early 1970s contracts also show common studies done in cancer vaccineology and molecular biology with Herpes -type viruses. Extracting, cloning, and mutating genetic material from herpes viruses risked transmitting or cross-contaminating subjects involved in Litton and Litton’s privies-in-interest’s leukemia and sarcoma studies. The SVCP contractors received their supplies of these products from Litton under their contract (NIH-69-2160). Through such collaboration with zur Hausen and his colleagues in Philadelphia, and Montagnier’s colleagues in France, it is most likely zur Hausen “discovered” another herpes-type DNA virus that had been mutated during the SVCP that zur Hausen simply named or re-named “HPV”.

C. The Common Practice of Renaming Viruses Confusing Who Discovered What

It is public knowledge that SVCP investigators commonly named or renamed viruses for fame and fortune. For example, it is widely known in virology that Dr. Hilleman at Merck renamed the “Stewart-Eddy polyoma virus (SE-polyoma)” to “SV40”. The two women discovered SE polyoma in Merck’s polio vaccine in 1962. Then there was the Nobel-thursty Gallo, snubbed by the KI’s Nobel Prize committee for doing worse with Montagier’s “discovery.”

There is “General Acceptance” that Montagnier supplied Gallo with HIV for Gallo’s NCI studies. Serious doubts about this “story” are raised, however, by the aforementioned contractual evidence, including the dates of such viral trafficking. “It was the French virus that Gallo’s lab used for their research,” the corporate-controlled media alleged.(5) “Gallo’s lab notes, obtained by the Chicago Tribune, show that the French virus was renamed a couple of times, apparently to hide the fact that it was being used. Gallo later claimed that the French virus didn’t grow.”(5) Given the general agreement of Gallo’s untrustworthiness, it is unreasonable to believe he didn’t falsify his lab notes and this entire story “obtained by the Chicago Tribune” that is infamous for fabricating stories.(5)

This reasonable objection follows not only the aforementioned contractual evidence, but also the objections raised by Robert Strecker, M.D., Ph.D., published in Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?  Strecker was interviewed by this author in 1996. He was the first American medical scholar who raised the lab virus AIDS-origin theory. Strecker stated that Montagnier, while working with Gallo at the NCI, discovered that “Epstein-Barr-infected T-cells will just churn out AIDS viruses day after day. . . .”  Strecker explained this discovery was necessary to overcome Gallo’s problem of producing enough HTLV- III viruses (HIVs) “to make enough antibody, ” because as the Chicago Tribute story stated, “the French virus didn’t grow.” Regarding this scandal–the French-American AIDS fracas–Strecker opined, “That’s all a lot of bull, because they both had the virus, and they both knew what they were doing from day one.”

D. Bionetic’s Little Known “Classified” History, Fraudulent Concealments, and Red Flags Urging Reconsideration of the SVCP’s Origin of Sexually-transmitted Diseases

As shown above, Litton Bionetics was the sixth leading biological weapons contractor in 1969. Robert Gallo served as the NCI’s Project Officer overseeing Litton’s contract, NIH-71-2025. Gallo also served in the SVCP as the Developmental Research Segment co-director. As mentioned, Litton Bionetics was the main cancer research supplier to the NCI and SVCP contractors. Litton supplied viruses including retroviruses, experimental reagents, and test animals including chimpanzees.(12)(15) The SVCP Progress Report #8 makes clear that Gallo’s collaborators at Litton Bionetics colonized several species of monkeys, and supplied cancer researchers and vaccine developers worldwide new experimental viruses, and monkey cell lines. Life Science, Inc. supplied enzymes and other supplies needed for vaccine research too.

Litton Bionetics’s contract followed closely the Stewart-Eddy 1962 discovery of cancers being spread through Merck’s polio vaccines.  Nearly a decade later, the NIH and NCI published Progress Report #8 that detailed Gallo’s leadership in the 71-2025 contract that began that same year, in 1962. The 1971 contract, titled “Investigations of Viral Carcinogenesis in Primates,” was expanded in 1972 as the first hepatitis B vaccines were injected into the Willowbrook children and gay volunteers in New York. (See also SVCP Progress Report 9, p. 195).(1)

Litton clearly supplied the Merck Drug Company with mutated viruses for vaccine studies in their contract 71-2059. Litton also supplied Merck with the monkeys and chimpanzees used to culture strains of hepatitis B viruses used by Johns Hopkins researchers as well. Through Merck and the SVCP, Litton’s investigators were supplying U.S. Army officials too, as well as the New York University Medical Center and Saul Krugman with experimental materials that were used in testing these agents on the mentally-retarded children. Litton’s chimps were used to grow the new viruses for this testing, including the new “hep B vaccine” (“AuAg” Australian antigen) viruses as you can read above. The gay men victimized were largely living in Greenwich Village. Merck’s advertisements used to attract homosexual volunteers can still be found online.(15)

All the above has been fraudulently concealed and/or recklessly neglected by willfully-blind officials and the complicit “fake news” media.

Genetic engineering at cooperating SVCP-NCI labs of viruses that were functionally identical to HIV and HPV a decade before their alleged discoveries provides adequate evidence for reasonable concern and reconsideration of this entire matter. Add to this evidence of reckless neglect the clinical emergence dates of these two diseases–HIV/AIDS and HPV cervical cancers both in 1976; the common sexually-transmitted disease connotation as with HBV also manufactured aqnd tested at that time; the satisfied incubation period for HIV/AIDS–2-to-5-years between the very first hep B vaccine trials in 1972-74, and zur Hausen’s collaboration with the Americans through Wistar and KI in the SVCP, (12)

Now add the red flag of corroborating evidence of Myers’s genetic identification of different strains of HIV, Type A and Type E, emerging contemporaneously in Africa and NYC at the precise locations of the HB vaccine experiments. Add further the precise set of cancers studied, including the pathognomic leukemia-lymphoma-sarcoma lab-engineered disease complex synchronously emerging while cervical cancer’s from HPV were reported emerging at the height of the herpes fright.

The KI’s 1969 contract NIH-69-2005 was titled “Studies of The Significance of Herpes-Type Virus in The Etiology of Some Human Cancers.” This SVCP Progress Report #9 covered the “4/9/71 – 4/8/73” period. The Segment Chairman was “Dr. Robert Manaker”–Robert Gallo’s supervisor at the NCI. Manaker was key program manager as Chairman of the “Developmental Research Segment” of the SVCP that included several prominent names in developmental virology including Dr. Anthony Girardi and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wister Institute. (See p. 6, of the SVCP, Progress Report #9.) These proven associations tie the relatively small group of suspects together in what appears to be a cancer virology racket. This racketeering enterprise is equally suspect for administering fraudulent concealments for unjust enrichment. The SVCP-KI contract shown below convincingly documents and confirms the statements made by Strecker about the importance of “Montagnier’s alleged discovery”–that EBV from Burkitt tumors added to T-lymphocytes will churn out antigens and viruses, such as we see with AIDS.

E. Solid Evidence of a “Conspiracy of Silence” and the “Smoking Gun”: Compounding Evidence of a Racketeering Enterprise in Vaccinology

“Conduct which forms a basis for inference is evidence. Silence is often evidence of the most persuasive character,” wrote the Honorable Chief Justice Louis Brandies in United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 US 149, 154 – Supreme Court 1923.

Shall the scientific community neglect the aforementioned red flags, links between the SVCP cooperating labs and zur Hausen’s and Montagnier’s little-discussed work in the US researching novel virus subtypes profiting private interests in the NCI and Life Science industry? Shall we neglect reconsidering these facts, the cumulative damage from these diseases, and their true causes revealing potential cures? Because if the true causes are being withheld, as Strecker opined, then the true cures may be similarly concealed.

Ethical practice compels reconsidering these matters by a special “independent” investigative committee and/or grand jury.

Diverting from “silence as evidence,” the media has offered, muddled, and debunked “conspiracy theories” as defective indictments. This media silence/negligence and conter-intelligence diverts from the facts and evidence published here and previously. (12) This author’s proofs have never been “debunked”, only ignored, silenced or censored.(12)(15)(18) This author has diagnosed this scheme of mainstream media hashing of facts, including diversions and obfuscations in the corporate-controlled social media. The pattern and practice of such malfeasance serves as a “protection racket” for the multi-trillion-dollar biotechnology and vaccinology industry. Millions of dollars spent to commission “pseudo-skeptics” and “debunkers” to write Op/Ed pieces and online slams is a drop in the bucket for Big Pharma. This allegation is proven by Big Pharma having been caught financing online “trolls” to supplement battalions of propagandists and PR firms issuing “fake news” and false commentaries as documented in the “Best Film-2016” UN-VAXXED: A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro. (19) None of the skeptics address the “smoking gun” or “missing link”–the chimpanzees.

There is “General Acceptance” in the scientific community that chimpanzees are the missing link to HIV. Yet, health officials and vaccine proponents have avoided and evaded their duties to examine the scientific evidence presented by this author in 1996 and repeatedly thereafter. The irrefutable evidence proves chimpanzees were used by the New York collaborators to develop the suspect hepatitis B vaccines given to the many victims beginning in 1972. In the follow-up large scale San Francisco study in 1978, according to Dr. Paul O’ Malley who headed up the Merck/CDC hepatitis B study, “an inordinate number of GRID victims” received the suspect vaccines. “Of the first twenty-four GRID cases in San Francisco, in fact, eleven were in the hepatitis B cohort.” (15)(21)

In 1976, at the time the first GRID cases were emerging in NYC, Robert Purcell, the Head of the Hepatitis Viruses Section of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) published repeatedly on the use of chimpanzees to culture and reproduce the new strains of HBV needed for human testing after the chimpanzees survived the initial injections. Below is a photocopy of Purcell’s grant application to extend trials from New York to San Francisco.

The grant application states, “A newly recognized clinical syndrome, type non-A, non-B hepatitis has been further defined and attempts to identify an etiologic agent intensified through transmission studies in chimpanzees.” (12)

Earlier references to the importance of using chimpanzees to culture and test the hepatitis B viral- vaccine-hybrids are equally compelling. At the International symposium on Viral Hepatitis, Milan, December 1974, Saul Krugman reviewed this subject in “Viral hepatitis type B: Prospects for active immunization. (15) He explained his early research citing the use of chimpanzees in preparing the test antigens of HBV for human trials. Krugman discussed the fact that initial trials were conducted on chimpanzees in the late 1960s, and “serosusceptible unimmunized persons [i.e., humans]” between 1970 and 1974 were injected. This matches precisely the suspect hepatitis B vaccine program in NYC and Willowbrook.

The media, both scientific and lay, has remained silent on these confirmed links to the “smoking gun”–the association between the use of chimpanzees in the suspect HBV vaccine trials in New York, and subsequent deaths.

F. Wikipedia publishes classic example of fraudulent concealment at Willowbrook

This general censorship, fraudulent concealment, and even obvious misrepresentation of dates and facts is best demonstrated by Wikipedia.  The Willowbrook school was closed in 1976 due to reports of child abuse. Wikipedia falsely claims the date of closing was “[i]n 1983, [when] the state of New York announced plans to close Willowbrook, which had been renamed the Staten Island Developmental Center in 1974.” That fraudulent misrepresentation diverts from public knowledge of the facility’s closing in 1976. Only the “school’s” biological testing center remained active to accommodate Saul Krugman, Robert Purcell, et. al. Their teams’ continued covert operations followed the clinical course of the immune-suppressive cancers in the hep B vaccine recipients.

The mainstream media neglected what the little known National Tattler heralded in 1972 as shown here by its headline: “Testers Inject Retarded Children with Hepatitis.” The hepatitis B injections for novel virus cancer studies were completely omitted from Geraldo Rivera’s extensive reporting on the “child abuse” at Willowbrook–a scandal that rocked the nation. Similar omissions are standard fare in subsequent news and documentary film productions.

Wikipedia also concealed from its Willowbrook coverage the fact that the blood of these earliest victims were “pooled” prior to screening methods becoming available for HIV. This resulted in contaminated blood and blood products being distributed. These products are widely known to have caused the outbreak of AIDS in the hemophiliac community and general populations that consumed these tainted blood products derived from the gay men in NYC and victims at Willowbrook.

Wikipedia further defrauded the public by concealing the military-industrial interests in the HB vaccine trails. Geraldo and Wikipedia neglected to report the names of the leading investigators and agencies, and also the evidence strongly indicating the first AIDS cases were appearing in Willowbrook test subjects in 1976 synchronous with the GRID cases emerging among homosexuals a few miles away.

Instead,  Wikipedia evidenced its complicity and criminal negligence by quoting Paul Offit–the leading propagandist for the vaccine industry. Offit is quoted in the Wikipedia Willowbrook coverage justifying the work of Saul Krugman and unnamed parties at Willowbrook. Offit neglected what the science world is concerned about most–the chimpanzee HIV/AIDS link in the hepatitis B vaccine trails.

None of the aforementioned spin sources mentioned this author’s published science. In fact, Wikipedia censored this author’s entire biography immediately preceding the “Ebola Emergency” of 2014. Before that, between 2008 and 2014, Wikipedia‘s biography smeared this author using fraudulent concealments to discredit his earlier works.

Wikipedia‘s fraudulent concealments, misrepresentations, and protection racket disparaging whistleblowers has aided-and-abetted by willful blindness the Life Science racket, and pan-genocide.

G. Correlations of Significance: Predicates and Evidence of Racketeering

The aforementioned certain correlations challenge public health and safety. These are compiled in this section, listed, and summarized below:

(1) Common Nobel Prize awards in medicine between two researchers in molecular biology in the same year for reportedly “discovering”  two “new viruses” claimed to have emerged contemporaneously.

(2) Common affiliation of the Nobel Prize’s Karolinska Institute with the NCI and SVCP through third party suspects, including the Wistar Institute and Litton Bionetics engaged in the precise research and development of leukemia, lymphoma, sarcoma retroviruses and DNA-type herpes viruses.

(3) Correlation between these “special viruses” and the never-before-seen AIDS “cancer complex” featuring these precise leukemia, lymphoma, sarcoma recombinants that were isolated and tested to induce such precise never-before-seen cancers during these trials.(3)(8) This evidence is pathognomonic for AIDS and its laboratory origin in the SVCP.

(4) Correction between the timely emergence of profound immune-suppresed clinical cases called GRID and later AIDS following the precise incubation period expected of “lentivirus” or retrovirus infections from the suspect hepatitis B vaccines administered between 1972 and 1974. (3)(8)

(5) Correlation between the herpes-type viruses subjected to genetic alterations in the SVCP labs and the emergence of the “new” DNA virus by zur Hausen et. al., involving the Wistar Institute, the KI and the NCI, favoring commercial enrichment by enterprise called the “Life Sciences Industry.”

(6) Correlation in the practice of renaming viruses for academic and commercial gain between what Robert Gallo did purportedly with Montagnier’s virus, and what zur Hausen appears to have done with the herpes-type DNA viruses “emerging” from the SVCP labs; thus creating a whole new commercially profitable “family” of herpes called HPVs.

(7) Correlation between the emergence of the first clinical cases of AIDS simultaneously on two far removed continents, in New York City and Central West Africa, precisely the locations where the suspect hepatitis B vaccines were tested.(3)(8)

(8) Correlation between the emergence of the first clinical cases of AIDS among the precise populations receiving the suspect hepatitis B vaccine, namely gay men in NYC and blacks in the AIDS belt of Africa (with Willobrook cases being censored). (3)(8)

(9) Correlation of similar behavioral methods used to develop the false “General Acceptance” in medicine and society that science is infallible and newly-discovered viruses exclusively “cause” deadly cancers, replacing the previously accepted “dogma” of multi-factorial risks.

10) Correlation of organized public relations attacks, smearing and libeling of individuals voicing opposition to objectionable practices in science for commerce; and most telling

11) The “conspiracy of silence” and negligence obstructing informed consent, human rights, public duties to safeguard society, and  scientific evidence analysis, open discourse, and justice under circumstances that are arguably treasonous and genocidal.

These eleven predicate acts evidencing racketeering activity as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (as defined in § 1961).

H. Racketeering in Health Science Fraud and Criminally Negligent Manslaughter

As stated under the aforementioned Standards of Review, the elements of fraud are satisfied by: “(1) the false representation that vaccines are “safe,” or “safe enough” for injection or oral consumption; 2) government officials’ and healthcare workers’ knowledge of the falsity of these representations of safety and efficacy (or without knowledge of their truth or falsity in willfully blind obedience to the false “General Acceptance”), (3) contemplating society’s and individual consumer’s reliance upon these false representations, (4) with society’s and consumer’s reliance upon these falsehoods;” (5) causing damage, side effects, illnesses, including brain damage, cancers, and deaths. Shoppe v. Gucci America, Inc., 14 P. 3d 1049 – Haw: Supreme Court 2000.

Similarly, the elements of fraudulent concealment are satisfied by the “employment of artifice” (e.g., false representations of safety or reasonable risk) “planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation, and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action.” Including the right to abstain from the “assault” as defined by law. The officials’ acts relied on are “of an affirmative character and fraudulent.” Lemson v. General Motors Corp., 66 Mich. App. 94, 97, 238 N.W.2d 414, 415 (1975) quoting De Haan v. Winter, 258 Mich. 293, 296, 241 N.W. 923, 924 (1932). This fraudulent concealment  also “involves the actions taken” by government and healthcare workers “to conceal a known cause of action” such as negligence, assault, breach of public duty to prevent injury, and/or death. Au v. Au, 626 P. 2d 173 – Haw: Supreme Court 1981.

The facts presented here, proven by government records and public knowledge evidences racketeering activities as defined by 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 and 1962. The “predicate acts” of the enterprise include: (1) bribery of public officials and media censors as the reference below involving Hawaii State Senator, Roz Baker demonstrates;(24) (2) extortion of persons to get vaccinated or risk dying from terroristically-threatened cancers or infections; (3) dealing falsely in controlled chemicals added to vaccines as ingredients, sterilizers, or adjuvants; (4) mail fraud and wire fraud in correspondence between officials, the media, and the public; (5) obstructing justice by scientific evidence tampering and corrupt influence over witnesses, whistleblowers, and the media; (6) obstruction of criminal investigations as occurred in 2002 when the Honorable Representative James A. Traficant, Jr. petitioned the U.S. General Accounting Office to investigate the origin of AIDS on behalf of Boyd Ed Graves (See reference 6: USGAO on SVCP Investigation); (7) tampering with witnesses, victims, and informants to preclude discovery and prosecution, as the USGAO did with this author who supplied credible scientific evidence censored by GAO officials during their whitewashing (6); (8) retaliating against witnesses, victims, and informants who sought relief and remedies as the enterprise did against Rep. Trafficant, Robert Strecker’s brother, Ted Strecker, resulting in the latter’s death. This author too has been retaliated against as evidenced by public corruption and Paul J. Sulla, Jr. having stolen my property in Hawaii; (9) relating to peonage and slavery in the abuse of test subject such as the Willowbrook children; (10) economic espionage and theft of trade secrets, as Dr. Gallo was vetted for doing purportedly damaging France; (11) interference with commerce in the natural healing arts and sciences by subverting the multi-factorial causes and cures for cancer and general immunity, while disparaging natural healthcare practices; (12) trafficking in biological weapons and chemical weapons under the guise of “cancer control” and”public health” involving fraud in the sale of drugs, vaccines, and securities financing the pharmaceutical companies; and (13) manufacturing and selling biological and chemical products under false pretenses.

Criminally negligent manslaughter is referred to as criminally negligent homicide in the United States. “It occurs where death results from serious negligence, or, in some jurisdictions, serious recklessness. A high degree of negligence is required to warrant criminal liability. This bar has been exceeded by the aforementioned facts. People are dying everywhere from myriad illnesses and drug side effects all prompted by the aforementioned vaccine contaminations. These are not “vaccine preventable diseases.” These are “vaccine induced illnesses” grossly neglected by ignorant or  “evil obedient” officials.  Willful blindness is related to criminal negligence. It occurs when a defendant intentionally puts themself in a position where the defendant will be unaware of facts which would render them liable.” (10) This is the overriding and overwhelming negligence witnessed in “public health” and medicine today.

Criminally negligent manslaughter also occurs where there is an omission to act when there is a duty to do so, or a failure to perform a duty owed, which leads to a death. In public health and medicine, officials and doctors are not only obligated by “public duty doctrine” and 42 U.S.C. § 1986 to prevent damage to citizens, but also by the Hippocratic oath to “above all do no harm.” Willful blindness to these two duties is widespread. The cause of this General acceptance” and willful blindness is behaviorally-engineered by the persuasive media fundamental to the racketeering enterprise.  The existence of the duty to save lives imposes criminal liability on the willfully blind who aid-and-abet the racket and its damage to society. Criminally negligent manslaughter is most common among professionals “who are grossly negligent in the course of their employment.” (22)


False “General Acceptance” has been socially-engineered in favor of the theories that HIV “causes” AIDS and HPV “causes” cervical cancers disregarding the many co-factors and commercial interests involved. This General Acceptance of “vaccine science” must be also rejected in light of the aforementioned evidence of scientific fraud, fraudulent concealment of the risks vs. benefits of vaccination, and the media persuasion and censorship practices abused to generate such General Acceptance. (13) So too must the fraud, omissions and misrepresentations of facts, scientific evidence tampering, censorship, and retaliation against witnesses and whistleblowers stop to secure public health and safety. This institutionalized criminal activity must be rejected by every official and activist in lieu of the aforementioned risks and widespread damage done by the “Life Sciences” industry. Urgent reconsideration must be given to the Special Virus Cancer Program (“SVCP”) as the apparent origin of the “sexually transmitted diseases” and their viruses claimed to be killing millions of people worldwide, and risking the lives of billions more.

Solid evidence reprinted above shows a commercial enterprise focusing on inducing cancers and viral mutations during the 1960s and early 1970s continuing to the present. The DNA herpes-type viruses and the RNA tumor-inducing immune suppressive retroviruses and their cross-hybrids were central to the mission and actions of the KI, Wistar Institute, Litton Bionetics, Johns Hopkins, the NCI, NIH, and the SVCP. Their officials and collaborating institutions and corporations are comparatively liable for the damages the enterprise has caused and continues to cause. The use of co-factors to induce cancers, including chemicals, radiation, and genetic recombinations of viruses isolated from cancers worldwide, is clear and compelling evidence of the earlier accepted “dogma.” The previous “Generally Accepted” dogma has been replaced by extending the “germ theory” into biotechnology and vaccinology for corporate profit over the public’s interest using fraudulent claims that the virus alone is the single etiological agent. (4)

The evidence presented here controverts the main defense raised by Dr. Robert Gallo as televised, that “gene cloning” and crude methods of recombinant biotechnology used during the 1960s and 1970s could not account for the emergence of HIV, HBV and HPV viruses “discovered” years later. This is clearly false. This “crude science” was the most active practice of the relatively small group of “experts” financed to administer the SVCP, NCI, NIH and co-contractors’ viral “discoveries.” This group hybridized and recombined the human and animal deadly viruses during this age of crude, albeit exploding, biotechnology leading to the commercial enterprise we have today.

Medically-legally, In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), established the need for “a standard of proof” concerning the “confidence our society thinks [w]e should have in the correctness of factual conclusions.” This “standard of proof” and “degree of condidence our society” places in vaccines, medicine, the cancer industry, hospitals, and public health has been irreparably damaged by the fraud and criminal actions evidenced herein. Big Pharma’s criminal enterprise suffers from its own shortcomings and wrongdoings. Consequently, the holding in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is most relevant. “General acceptance” of the “vaccine preventable disease” marketing ploy must be urgently reconsidered given the “pertinent evidence” showing fraud. The cited fraudulent concealments and criminal negligence results in manslaughter. This is hereby proven by the clear and convincing facts and government records in evidence. “[B]ased on [these] scientifically valid [government records and] principles” the devil-doers must be disciplined. And these facts clearly compel reconsideration of the entire vaccine industry as a public duty.

Given the legal standards by which fact-finders must justly rule, reasonable discretion holds that every vaccination imposes risks that have been generally concealed and misrepresented by officials and the media. Under these circumstances corrupted by fraud (28) the push for “manditory immunizations” for “vaccine preventable diseases” evidences a racketeering enterprise as defined by Title 18 Part I Chapter 96  § 1961. This racket and its scheme violates (among many other laws) Title 18 U.S.C., § 241-Conspiracy Against Rights.

This report is delivered to public health officials and lawmakers in Hawaii, but is applicable everywhere. A sworn certified service of this constructive notice sends the following message:  Who-so-ever acts by neglect or willful blindness of the aforementioned facts and evidence in government records, and disregards the elements of fraud and felonies in the vaccine industry, aids-and-abets the criminal racket. Such offenders shall be liable under Title 18 USC § 4 – for Misprision of felony, among other laws; and any damage resulting from such negligence, recklessness, or malfeasance, is actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1986.

— END —

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author proudly declares two conflicting commercial interests in the presentation of this information: (1) NASA science was supplemented by this author’s pioneering development of  OxySilver–a 528 Solfeggio-frequency-enhanced oligodynamic silver-hydrosol incorporating water-structuring and micro-clustering technology to enhance energetic memory and cellular absorption for optimal benefits claimed to “make all vaccinations and antibiotics obsolete;” and (2) the industry-wide commercial replacement of the risky, costly, and monopolistic allopathic medical paradigm by the freeing natural healing arts and sciences featuring 528 frequency discoveries in musical mathematics.


(1) Gardasil package insert is available for download from the FDA at:

(2) Caulfield MJ, Shi L, et. al., Effect of alternative aluminum adjuvants on the absorption and immunogenicity of HPV16 L1 VLPs in mice. 2007 Jul-Aug;3(4):139-45. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

(3) Horowitz LG. Special Virus Cancer Program. Medical Veritas online journal and press release. “Special Virus Cancer Program” (“SVCP”) Concealed Contracts Evidencing Man-Made AIDS Pandemic Released in 20-Year Anniversary of Amazing Discovery.” December 5, 2016. You can purchase two of these Reports HERE in pdf file downloads.

(4) Press Release. Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier Win Nobel Prize for Discovery of HIV. October 6, 2008. The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet.

(5) Roberts S. What AIDS Researcher Dr. Robert Gallo Did in Pursuit of the Nobel Prize. Spy July 1990.

(6) U.S.G.A.O. Origin of the AIDS Virus. Briefing for the Office of the Honorable James A. Traficant, Jr. GAO-02-809R, June 17, 2002.

(7) Interview of Dr. Maurice Hilleman by medical historian Edward Shorter’s discussing Merck’s vaccine-making, in which Hilleman stated, “We brought in the African greens . . . We didn’t know we were importantin AIDS virus at the time.”

(8) Keim B. Did Merck bring AIDS to America? No. WIRED, September 19, 2007. This article is another classic example of “Big Pharmaflag.”  WIRED receives the vast majority of its advertising revenue from Big Biotech. This article exemplifies frivolous argument, diversionary focus, and recklessness in news reporting concealing serious risks to public health and safety from vaccines. Keim falsely claims “the off-camera Merck researchers laugh loudly, and someone quips, ‘What Merck won’t do to develop a vaccine.’ following Hilleman’s crucial admission that corrobrates the science. (7) In fact, the nervous laughter came from a WGBH crew, recording the interview for public television.

(9)Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. Health Officials Alarmed by Declining U.S. Vaccination Rates, Country Could Face Scenario Like Europe’s Measles Outbreak. Astho. October 26, 2018.

(10) Kane S. Healthcare Holy War Waged by Hearst Challenges World Religions. August 30, 2016.

(11) Horrobin, D.F. 1990. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 263:1438–1441. Dr. Horrobin was terribly smeared by critics online, including Wikipedia, following his publication of this author’s following paper. Dr. Horrobin is heavily smeared by Wikipedia that publishes an outrageously deceptive page on Willowbrook, as discussed above.

(12) Horowitz LG. Polio, hepatitis B and AIDS: an integrative theory on a possible vaccine induced pandemic. 2001 May; 56(5):677-86.

(13) To summarize the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Daubert standard, the court wrote: “‘General acceptance’ is not a necessary precondition to the admissibility of scientific evidence under the Federal Rules of Evidence, but the Rules of Evidence— especially Rule 702—do assign to the trial judge the task of ensuring that an expert’s testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand. Pertinent evidence based on scientifically valid principles will satisfy those demands.”

(14) NCI staff. The Special Virus Cancer Program: Progress Report #8. Office of the Associate Scientific Director for Viral Oncology (OASDVO). J.B. Moloney, Ed., Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.

(15) Horowitz LG. Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? Tetrahedron Press, Rockport, MA, 1996, pp. 6-7. , The book is available through the author’s sponsors for a nominal fee HERE.

(16) Horton R. Offline: What is medicine’sw 5 Sigma? Commentary in Vol. 385, April 11, 2015, p. 1380.

(17) College of Physicians of Philadelphia. The History of Vaccines. Debunked: The Polio Vaccine and HIV Link Online at:

(18) Department of Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawaii, republication of “UN Censors Dr. Leonard Horowitz’s Origin of AIDS Hypothesis. Online at:

(20) UN-VAXXED: A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro,  a Leonard G. Horowitz production in association with Medical Veritas International, Inc. 2016.

(21) Cantwell A. UN to censor Dr. Len Horowitz manmade AIDS research. March 4, 2008. Published on

(22) Wikipedia, defining criminally negligent manslaughter, at: .

(23) USDHEW. Virology Vol. 4–Control of Viral Infections. NIAID Task Force Report, Bethesda, MD: Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health (NIH) 79-1834, 1979, p. 20-65.

(24) Zur Hausen’s “discovery” was said to have been made against the prevailing view during the 1970s concerning multi-factorial cancer. He postulated a role for human papilloma virus (HPV) in cervical cancer. He assumed that the tumour cells, if they contained an oncogenic virus, should harbour viral DNA integrated into their genomes. The HPV genes promoting cell proliferation should therefore be detectable by specifically searching tumour cells for such viral DNA. Harald zur Hausen pursued this idea for over 10 years by searching for different HPV types, a search made difficult by the fact that only parts of the viral DNA were integrated into the host genome. He found novel HPV-DNA in cervix cancer biopsies, and thus discovered the new, tumourigenic HPV16 type in 1983. In 1984, he cloned HPV16 and 18 from patients with cervical cancer. The HPV types 16 and 18 were consistently found in about 70% of cervical cancer biopsies throughout the world.

(25) Krugman S. “Viral hepatitis type B: Prospects for active immunization.” In: International Symposium on Viral Hepatitis, Milan, Dec. 1974. Develop. biol. Standard. Vol. 30, Munich: S. Karger Basel, 1975, pp. VI; 363-367; the General Discussion can be found on pp. 375-379.

(26) Charges against Hawaii State Senator Roz Baker’s on evidence of bribery is presented in an article published on by authors Sherri Kane, Leonard G. Horowitz, and anonymous attorneys.

(27) Here is hard evidence of the General acceptance of multi-factorial cancer etiology, directly from page 30 of the SVCP 1977 Report No. 14. Notice this record heralds “Co-Carcinogenesis” involving “biological, chemical, or physical” or environmental factors such as radiation in cancer induction studies. These assaults compounded viral damage from mutating, hybridizing, and recombining especially Herpes DNA viruses (similar to HPV “discovered” by zur Hausen humans and moneys).

(27) In the author’s opinion, pursuant to the “General acceptance” of vaccines and claims of “safety and efficacy” or “reasonable risk” assurances, the following individuals bear a special burden and should be investigated for conflicting interests, fraud, and treason. This opinion is based on the facts and evidence provided in this article. Such “due process” requires a grand jury to issue indictments, to be advanced by a special “independent” prosecutor free from political and financial interests:

(A) Director of the CDC, Dr. Robert R. Redfield, MD, who co-founded the University of Maryland’s Institute of Human Virology with Dr. William Blattner and Dr. Robert Gallo.


B. Director of the HHS, Alex M. Lazar II, was the senior vice president for corporate affairs and communications at Eli Lilly and Co. From 2012 to 2017, he served as president of Eli Lilly USA LLC, the company’s largest affiliate. In 2009, Eli Lilly pleaded guilty of defrauding doctors and consumers by promoting Zyprexa for dementia. The $1.415 billion penalty included an $800 million civil settlement and a $515 million criminal fine. The Justice Department said the criminal fine of $515 million was the largest ever in a healthcare case and the largest criminal fine for an individual corporation ever imposed in a US criminal case.

It must be known that Eli Lily produces “Thimerosal”–the mercury preservative used in vaccines linked to autistic spectrum disorder. A provision was fraudulently and untimely inserted into the Homeland Security Act indemnifying vaccine makers against liability at the instruction of George H.W. Bush who sat on the Board of Directors at Eli Lily during the 1970’s when the SVCP and Litton Bionetics operated. The provision must be repealed in the interest of public health, public safety, and justice.

(28) The issue of “fake news” and “pseudo-skeptics” operating in the vaccine arena and wielded by Big Pharma is adequately addressed in the author’s film UN-VAXXED: A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro, citation #20. A scientific basis for industry-wide reconsideration of “pseudo-skepticism” and its role in fraudulently “debunking” real science is published by Neppe VM and Close ER: Does the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) alter the landscape from 4D science to 9D science? The controversy of conventional scientific materialism versus integrating multidimensionality, the infinite and consciousness. IQ Nexus Journal 10: 3, v6.23; 7-46, 2018.



Peer Reviewers Comments



“Sorry. This isn’t for me.”

Lt. Gov. Elect Josh Green, M.D., State of Hawaii. Past Hawaii State Senator.




There is no one in medical science who has worked more diligently than Dr. Leonard Horowitz to uncover the hidden and suppressed history of medical research that preceded the epidemic of AIDS. He emphasizes the secret biowarfare program approved by the U.S. Congress in 1969, designed to create new lethal infectious agents designed to overwhelm the immune system. In addition, he scrupulously researches the Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1980) whereby scientists attempted to create cancers in animals (especially primates) by infecting them with all sorts of viruses.

Undoubtedly, “new” viruses were created and genetically-engineered in the process. By the end of the 1970s a new primate derived virus suddenly appeared, later named HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), exclusively infecting male homosexuals in Manhattan. The “gay plague” clearly traces back to the experimental hepatitis B vaccine program (1978-1981) which exclusively used gay and bisexual men in Manhattan as participants.

The prevailing theory accepted by almost all AIDS scientists (without clear evidence) is that HIV/AIDS began when a hunter cut himself on monkey meat in Africa and started the epidemic. However, after three decades of intensive research and reporting, both Horowitz and I are convinced that AIDS is a man-made disease, which originated not in Africa but in New York City. Although as reporting health professionals we are basically alone in our outspoken beliefs, our uncovering of the secret and suppressed science surrounding AIDS origin as well as so called “emerging viruses, ” lends scientific evidence to our contention. For anyone who is not convinced that AIDS came from monkeys “out of Africa”, but rather from deranged animal experimentation and microbial manipulation, I suggest reading Horowitz’s writings and taking them seriously.

You are not likely to find his revelations in medical journals or in the major media, which has never allowed any serious discussion of AIDS “conspiracy theories.”

Alan Cantwell, M.D.,

Author of AIDS & the Doctors of Death, and Queer Blood.



About the Author

In the video linked HERE, Dr. Robert Gallo is confronted by Dr. Leonard Horowitz at the XI International Conference on AIDS wherein Dr. Gallo was caught lying. Dr. Gallo covered-up his affiliation with Litton Bionetics, the main supplier of genetically-engineered viruses and lab animals from which HIV/AIDS emerged. Today, more than 40 years later, approximately 40 million people have died of AIDS.

Dr. Horowitz’s 1996 National best-selling book titled Emerging Viruses: AIDS and EBOLA: Nature, Accident, or Intentional? was promoted by President Barack Obama’s spiritual advisor, Jeremiah Wright in 2008. The video linked HERE records the minister’s defense concerning statements he made regarding the AIDS virus being man-made to target people of color.