Home COVID-19 HIV Spike Protein Gene: Virologists Confirm No Credible Natural Ancestor

COVID-19 HIV Spike Protein Gene: Virologists Confirm No Credible Natural Ancestor

COVID-19 HIV Spike Protein GeneHIV Spike Protein Gene “Fingerprints” in COVID-19: Virologists Confirm No Credible Natural Ancestor

Foreword by

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz

(MedicalVeritas.org; May 30, 2021)


I accurately, honestly, comprehensively, and scientifically warned you, but you deprived me of saving millions, possibly billions of lives.

By the end of January 2020, I urgently told you in my articles and videos precisely what is now being confirmed internationally. That the COVID-19 menace to civilization sprang from a lab-virus, mutated and “hyper-weaponized,” using at least four genes from the AIDS virus, HIV-1.

This bioweapon, I told you, features the Spike protein (S-protein) attachment mechanism. I told you this was hyper-acidified, thus made hyper-transmissible.

How did I know this? As the Editor-in-Chief of Medical Veritas International, Inc. i receive timely science reports from investigators worldwide. The urgent science from Pradham et. al., immediately captured my scrutiny in January 2020. That was before Prashant Pradhan (shown below with his academic and IBM credentials) came under political-pressure to retract his group’s outstanding paper.

Had Dr. Pradhan not caved to presumed extortion, millions of lives may have been saved. The lab virus financiers and manufacturers could have been arrested and convicted by now. And knowledge about how the HIV/AIDS Spike protein works, as an addition to the SARS-coronavirus mutant, could have directed everyone to safety.

I informed you that inexpensive COVID-19 remedies and preventatives existed, but were being secreted and discredited. These include the wide array of anti-oxidants such as hydroxychloroquine, OxySilverTM with 528, vitamins, and nutraceuticals such as chlorophyll, that I’ve been promoting for years.

I subsequently informed you honestly and responsibly as an AIDS virus expert and consumer health activist the best ways to prevent transmissions of infectious diseases, and illnesses including cancers, especially by “loading up with anti-oxidants.”

orign of coronavirusBut the corporate-controlled media censored my preventative messages too.

The media controllers consistently censored Horowitz’s publications beginning before I even published the number one best-selling book in the world in this field of Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?

I began work on that book in 1993, after Big Pharma’s covert intelligence operatives in the media began to censor and smear my scientific publications explaining the “Florida Dental AIDS Tragedy.” Based on my science papers I published Deadly Innocence–The Kimberly Bergalis Case: Solving the Greatest Murder Mystery in the History of Medicine. These publications best explained how and why Florida dentist David Acer transmitted his strain of HIV to at least six patients. It also explained why the CDC covered-up this tragedy for politics and drug industry profits.

Accordingly, no improvements in medical ethics has occurred during the past quarter century. In fact, the medical industry’s integrity, including scientific credibility, has degenerated under the influence of censorship, propaganda, and drugs.

I told you correctly that vaccinations would make things worse, not better. Vaccines would not neutralize the positively-charged attachment mechanism on the AIDS virus, nor the COVID-19 virus Spike protein. Vaccines would not boost natural immunity like anti-oxidants do. I told you that “herd immunity” was a fantasy spun exclusively for deceptive trade, that is, vaccine sales.

Unfortunately, my words and works were censored and smeared. Even by you who never shared my life’s work with others. I passed you the ball, and you dropped it.

Even you supposed “independent” voices, “activists,” and “natural medicine advocates” in my “inner circle.” You betrayed me, my partner and Associate Editor of Medical Veritas, Sherri Kane, and humanity too. You vicariously joined forces with darkness. Big Pharma’s propagandists, like you deceptive activists, censored, smeared, and discredited me. Even you so-called “friends” spread ‘counter-intelligence’–also called controlled opposition like my enemies. You published and spread flawed articles to justify “pseudo-science skeptics,” and you enabled the discrediting label “conspiracy theorist” to be applied to heroic truth tellers. You lumped me into their category, spread their discrediting articles, but never my accurate ones.

As a result, now, and increasingly, millions, possibly billions of people will suffer and die from such unconscionable ignorance and demonic malice.

For more than a quarter century I have been screaming like a lone voice in the wilderness what Dr. Angus Dalgleish (“best known for creating the world’s first ‘HIV vaccine'”) and virologist Birger Sørensen, conclude in their vitally-important past-urgent scientific report:

It is “imperitive to reconsider what type of ‘Gain of Function’ experiments it is morally acceptable to undertake. Because of the wide social impact, these decisions cannot be left to research scientists alone.”

Beginning in 1996, with the first edition of the grass-roots-made best-selling longest-enduring textbook in this field, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?, I urged in desperation the same neglected advice.

Now, with a heavy and disappointed heart, I conclude it is “too late”. The SARS/CoV/HIV ‘mutant has been loosed.’ ‘Pandora’s box’ was opened in Wuhan. The Pfizer and Moderna super-hyped mRNA vaccines are ‘Trojan horses.’ They are mass-producing the same HIV/AIDS S-protein “antigens” now shedding, spreading, and mutating other viruses worldwide in people and the environment.

This will, sooner than later, exonerate the genocidalists that brought this plague upon us. The “natural mutations” will obfuscate their criminal mischief.

The advanced “gain of function” toxicity shall be increasinly devastating to people worldwide. This is especially so among those with weakened immunity.

Don’t we all now suffer similarly, courtesy of the military-medical-petrochemical-pharmaceutical globalists who sold us and exposed us to the manufactured chemical and biological poisons they deployed?

How shall we stand together once these genocidal menaces impose and interpose “the Cloud” between our brains?

That is, after all, the intention–the profitable population-control, data-mining, and brain-Cloud “transhumanism”–Big Tech has advertised.

This ethical and moral darkness will not be defeated by ignorance nor divisiveness rampant by malicious intent of the PharmaMedia–mainstream, social, or independent.

Despite all of this doom-and-gloom, the Honorable Angus Dalgleish and Birger Sørensen deserve our thanks for their heroism. Their sciencne is “better late than never.” I only regret that they were silent when I needed them twenty-five years ago when I discovered that HIV/AIDS was invented by Gallo et. al. at Litton Bionetics, and spread through contaminated hepatitis B vaccines.


Virologists Say Genetic “Fingerprints” Prove COVID-19 Man-Made, ‘No Credible Natural Ancestor’

SATURDAY, MAY 29, 2021

Two notable virologists claim to have found “unique fingerprints” on COVID-19 samples that only could have arisen from laboratory manipulation, according to an explosive 22-page paper obtained by the Daily Mail.

The paper’s authors, Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen (left) and British Professor Angus Dalgleish (right) via the Daily Mail

British professor Angus Dalgleish – best known for creating the world’s first ‘HIV vaccine’, and Norwegian virologist Dr. Birger Sørensen – chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, who has published 31 peer-reviewed papers and holds several patents, wrote that while analyzing virus samples last year, the pair discovered “unique fingerprints” in the form of “six inserts” created through gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

hey also conclude that “SARS-Coronavirus-2 has “no credible natural ancestor” and that it is “beyond reasonable doubt” that the virus was created via “laboratory manipulation.”

DailyMail.com exclusively obtained the 22-page paper

which is set to be published in the scientific journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery. In it, researchers describe their months-long ‘forensic analysis’ into experiments done at the Wuhan lab between 2002 and 2019 (Daily Mail) CLICK HERE to view large abstract.

A ‘GenBank’ table included in the paper lists various coronavirus strains, with the dates they were collected and then when they were submitted to the gene bank, showing a delay of several years for some (Daily Mail)

Last year, Sørensen told Norwegian broadcaster NRK that COVID-19 has properties which have ‘never been detected in nature,’ and that the United States has ‘collaborated for many years on coronavirus research through “gain of function” studies with China.

One diagram of the coronavirus shows six ‘fingerprints’ identified by the two scientists, which they say show the virus must have been made in a lab (Daily Mail)
A second diagram showed how a row of four amino acids found on the SARS-Cov-2 spike have a positive charge that clings to human cells like a magnet, making the virus extremely infectious (Daily Mail)

The paper detailing their months-long “forensic analysis,” which looked back at experiments done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology between 2002 and 2019, is set to be published in the scientific journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery.

More via the Mail:

Digging through archives of journals and databases, Dalgleish and Sørensen pieced together how Chinese scientists, some working in concert with American universities, allegedly built the tools to create the coronavirus. 
Much of the work was centered around controversial ‘Gain of Function‘ research – temporarily outlawed in the US under the Obama administration.
Gain of Function involves tweaking naturally occurring viruses to make them more infectious, so that they can replicate in human cells in a lab, allowing the virus’s potential effect on humans to be studied and better understood. 
Dalgleish and Sørensen claim that scientists working on Gain of Function projects took a natural coronavirus ‘backbone’ found in Chinese cave bats and spliced onto it a new ‘spike’, turning it into the deadly and highly transmissible SARS-Cov-2.
One tell-tale sign of alleged manipulation the two men highlighted was a row of four amino acids they found on the SARS-Cov-2 spike.
In an exclusive interview with DailyMail.com, Sørensen said the amino acids all have a positive charge, which cause the virus to tightly cling to the negatively charged parts of human cells like a magnet, and so become more infectious
But because, like magnets, the positively charged amino acids repel each other, it is rare to find even three in a row in naturally occurring organisms, while four in a row  is ‘extremely unlikely,’ the scientist said.
‘The laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged amino acids in a row. The only way you can get this is if you artificially manufacture it,’ Dalgleish told DailyMail.com.
Their new paper says these features of SARS-Cov-2 are ‘unique fingerprints’ which are ‘indicative of purposive manipulation‘, and that ‘the likelihood of it being the result of natural processes is very small.’
A natural virus pandemic would be expected to mutate gradually and become more infectious but less pathogenic which is what many expected with the COVID-19 pandemic but which does not appear to have happened,’ the scientists wrote.
The implication of our historical reconstruction, we posit now beyond reasonable doubt, of the purposively manipulated chimeric virus SARS-CoV-2 makes it imperative to reconsider what types of Gain of Function experiments it is morally acceptable to undertake.
The study concluded ‘SARS-Coronavirus-2 has no credible natural ancestor’ and that it is ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ that the virus was created through ‘laboratory manipulation’ (Daily Mail)
When Sørensen and Dalgleish floated their findings last year, it was ‘debunked’ with the thinnest of logic– however former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove pointed to the pair’s findings as an “important” development which could prove that the pandemic may have originated at the WIV.

Sørensen and Dalgleish aren’t the first scientists to find unusual features within COVID-19. Last June, the Daily Telegraph reported that there are two unique features to COVID-19:
First, the virus binds more strongly to human ACE2 enzymes than any other species, including bats.
Second, SARS-CoV-2 has a “furin cleavage site” missing in its closes bat-coronavirus relative, RaTG-13, which makes it significantly more infectious – a finding we reported in late February.
According to Israeli geneticist, Dr. Ronen Shemesh, the Furin site is the most unusual finding.
“I believe that the most important issue about the differences between ALL coronavirus types is the insertion of a Furin protease cleavage site at the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2,” he said. “Such an insertion is very rare in evolution, the addition of such 4 Amino acids alone in the course of only 20 years is very unlikely.”
“There are many reasons to believe that the COVID-19 generating SARS-CoV-2 was generated in a lab. Most probably by methods of genetic engineering,” he said, adding “I believe that this is the only way an insertion like the FURIN protease cleavage site could have been introduced directly at the right place and become effective.

Dr. Shemesh, who has a PhD in Genetics and Molecular Biology from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, and over 21 years of experience in the field of drug discovery and development, said it is even “more unlikely” that this insertion happened in exactly the right place of the cleavage site of the spike protein – which is where it would need to occur to make the virus more infectious. Daily Telegraph

“What makes it even more suspicious is that fact that this insertion not only occurred on the right place and in the right time, but also turned the cleavage site from an Serine protease cleavage site to a FURIN cleavage site,” he added.
In January 2020, a team of Indian scientists wrote in a now-retracted paper that the coronavirus may have been genetically engineered to incorporate parts of the HIV genome, writing “This uncanny similarity of novel inserts in the 2019- nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature,” meaning – it was unlikely to have occurred naturally.
The next month, a team of researchers in Nankai University noted that COVID-19 has an ‘HIV-like mutation’ that  allows it to quickly enter the human body by binding with a receptor called ACE2 on a cell membrane.

Other highly contagious viruses, including HIV and Ebola, target an enzyme called furin, which works as a protein activator in the human body. Many proteins are inactive or dormant when they are produced and have to be “cut” at specific points to activate their various functions.

When looking at the genome sequence of the new coronavirus, Professor Ruan Jishou and his team at Nankai University in Tianjin found a section of mutated genes that did not exist in Sars, but were similar to those found in HIV and Ebola. –SCMP

According to the Nankai University study, the furin binding method is “100 to 1,000 times as efficient’ as SARS at entering cells.
This protein cleaving protein is highly promiscuous, it’s found in many human tissues and cell types and is involved in many OTHER virus types activation and infection mechanisms (it is involved in HIV, Herpes, Ebola and Dengue virus mechanisms),” said Dr. Shemesh. “If I was trying to engineer a virus strain with a higher affinity and infective potential to humans, I would do exactly that: I would add a Furin Cleavage site directly at the original less effective and more cell specific cleavage site.”
Meanwhile, Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky found last year either “a remarkable coincidence or a sign of human intervention” within COVID-19 telling the Telegraph that COVID-19 is “exquisitely adapted to humans.”
Professor Nikolai Petrovsky
“We really don’t know where this virus came from – that’s the truth. The two possibilities is that it was a chance transmission of a virus…the other possibility is that it was an accidental release of the virus from a laboratory,” he said, adding “One of the possibilities is that an animal host was infected by two coronaviruses at the same time and COVID-19. The same process can happen in a petri-dish.”
“In other words COVID-19 could have been created from that recombination event in an animal host or it could have occurred in a cell-culture experiment. I’m certainly very much in favour of a scientific investigation. Its only objective should be to get to the bottom of how did this pandemic happen and how do we prevent a future pandemic.”
Keep in mind – reporting any of this last year was punishable by social media banishment, demonization, and hit-piece articles from propagandists peddling CCP talking points.